Your score measures maturity,
Bastion enhances safety.
Maturity and deployment safety are different questions. The Concordance Framework answers the first. Risk Bastion answers the second — by evaluating 11 gate standards that can't be averaged away.
Maturity and deployment safety are different questions.
A team can be highly mature — strong reviews, good documentation, clean CI — and still ship every release as an all-or-nothing event with no rollback. Risk Bastion is specifically built to surface that gap.
Four ratings. One honest answer about deployment safety.
Bastion produces a single rating per team — not a score to interpret, but a classification that tells you whether your blast radius is managed. It reads the same scan data as the rest of Concordance, but refuses to average critical gate properties into an overall number.
11 gate standards. Evaluated as gates, not averages.
These 11 standards already exist in the Concordance Framework. Bastion applies a different instrument to them: a single critical gate at 1 sets the rating to Uncontained, regardless of everything else. That's not a contradiction of the framework — it's a more honest reading of it for deployment safety specifically.
From scan to risk rating in minutes
Same fix. Three lenses move.
Because Bastion reads the same 50 standards as the rest of Concordance, fixing a gate standard doesn't just improve your Bastion rating — it also moves your SDLC score and, in many cases, your Signal compliance coverage. One engineering action, three measurable payoffs.
Know your blast radius now.
Connect your repos and Concordance will compute your Bastion rating, identify your failing gates, and give you a prioritized resolution plan — using scan data you already have.