50 standards across 6 SDLC phases. The open, evidence-based standard for measuring engineering practice maturity. No surveys. No self-assessments. No six-month audits. Scores are derived from real artifacts in your toolchain — commits, PRs, tickets, pipelines, and incident history.
In an era where AI can generate code faster than teams can review it, the practices around that code — how it's reviewed, tested, released, and operated — matter more than ever. The framework that governs your SDLC is now the bottleneck, not the code itself.
The framework is open (CC BY 4.0) and free to use as your organization's SDLC standard. No procurement, no vendor assessment, no security review. Link to this page, adapt what you need, and start measuring today.
ENTERPRISE & REGULATED
Fortune 500, post-M&A, multi-vendor
Silos everywhere, shadow IT, inconsistent practices across FTEs, MSPs, and consultants. No unified view of engineering maturity. Frequent Sev1/2 incidents. You need a standard everyone can rally around — without a 6-month consulting engagement to define it.
YOUR MOVE
Link this page as your engineering SDLC standard. Set a target maturity level (3 “Defined” is the professional baseline). Hold every team — internal and vendor — to the same 50 standards. Measure manually now, automate with the tool when procurement clears.
GROWING STARTUP
Series A/B, 15-100 engineers, scaling fast
You've outgrown “move fast and break things.” An enterprise customer just asked about SOC 2. Your first Sev1 hit on a Friday night and nobody knew the runbook. You hired engineer #20 and realized there's no documented process for anything.
YOUR MOVE
You don't need consultants or a 3-month wiki project. Adopt the 50 standards that matter at your stage. Connect GitHub and see where you stand in minutes. Use the gaps to prioritize what to fix first. Grow into the rest as you scale.
Get started in 30 minutes
1
Browse the 50 standards below. Identify the phases most relevant to your pain — incidents? quality? traceability?
2
Self-assess your teams against the maturity levels (1–5). Be honest — the gaps are the value.
3
Share the results with your engineering leadership. Set a target maturity level (3 "Defined" is the professional baseline).
4
Make it policy. Add the framework to your engineering handbook. Reassess quarterly and track the trend.
The 50 Standards
The complete reference. Click any standard to see scoring rubric (1–5), evidence sources, and how to improve.
1
Reactive
No defined process. Ad hoc. Depends on heroics.
2
Emerging
Some practices exist but inconsistently applied.
3
Defined
Processes documented and followed. Professional baseline.
4
Managed
Measured and actively improved. Data-driven.
5
Optimizing
Continuous improvement embedded in culture.
Showing 50 of 50 standards
📋Requirements8 standards
🏗️Design6 standards
💻Development11 standards
🧪Testing9 standards
🚀Release8 standards
📡Operations8 standards
Sample policy statement
Copy, adapt, and add to your engineering handbook
Effective [DATE], engineering practices at [COMPANY]
are aligned to The Concordance Framework v1.0
(https://app.getconcordance.com/framework).
All teams — internal, vendor, and contract — must
target a minimum maturity level of 3 ("Defined")
across all 50 standards within [TIMEFRAME].
Priority areas: Operations (incident response,
postmortems, runbooks), Testing (CI gating, security
scanning), and Requirements (traceability, acceptance
criteria).
Exceptions require written approval from [ROLE].
Progress will be reviewed [quarterly/monthly].
See how your team scores against these standards
Connect GitHub and Jira/Linear. Concordance scans all 50 standards in minutes with real evidence.